Närvarande Modern Teknisk Utrustning
2024-07-22
..den mest moderna tekniska utrustningen var det väl sagt fanns på plats..
https://x.com/MJTruthUltra/status/1813959630193664217
Everyone should read this…
The NYT Reporter who Captured the Bullet Flying Past Trumps Head, was using the Kind of Camera & Settings you’d Use to Capture Live-Fire Action, Such as a Head Exploding!@Michael_Yon
, one of the most experienced combat war correspondents living today, made a Compelling assessment.
I put together his assessment in a more understandable breakdown, provided additional details, and my analysis.
Quoted from the NYT• Who was the Photographer?
—— A famous veteran NYT photographer named Doug Mills.
• What Kind of Equipment & Settings were used?
—— Mr. Mills was using a Sony A1 and 24mm f/1.4 GM, capable of capturing images at up to 30 frames per second. Priced at $6,499.
—— He took these photos with a shutter speed of 1/8,000th of a second. Extremely Fast by industry standards.
The above is quoted from NYT themselves.
Source: (https://nytimes.com/.../photo-path-trump-assassination.html)
The Perfect “Shot”• If the gunman was firing an AR-15-style rifle, the .223-caliber or 5.56-millimeter bullets they use travel at roughly 3,200 feet per second when they leave the weapon’s muzzle.
—— “And with a 1/8,000th of a second shutter speed, this would allow the bullet to travel approximately four-tenths of a foot while the shutter is open.”
• Most cameras used to capture images of bullets in flight are using extremely high speed specialty cameras not normally utilized for regular photography, so catching a bullet on a side trajectory as seen in that photo would be a one in a million shot and nearly impossible to catch even if one knew the bullet was coming.
At that distance and trajectory, had any bullet hit Trump, that type of camera and settings would have easily captured his head frankly exploding.
Were they there for the “Perfect Pulitzer Prize Head Shot”…?
COUNTER ARGUMENTS• “Some journalists argue Its usage by the NYT photographers is not unusual.”
—— Only professional photographers can answer this question.
• “Shooting at 1/8000 at f1.6 in daylight is also not unusual, but necessary for proper exposure.”
—— again, only Professional and unbiased photographers can answer that question.
CRITICAL QUESTIONS THAT WILL EITHER PROVE OR DEBUNK THIS• Examine any and all Video footage of the Photographer, Doug Mills, at least 1-2 minutes before the shot.
—— check body language.
—— how many images did he capture leading up to THAT moment?
—— was he ultra focused in the moments leading up to the shots?
• How many times has Doug Mills photographed at a Trump rally?
—— apply that same question to other cameramen & photographers.
• Who made the decision to send Doug Mills there?
—— climb the ladder.
• How common is it for these kinds of cameras and these settings used to capture rally speeches, where the “object” being photographed is standing still?
—— Trump campaign photographers can weigh in easily on this, or maybe even Gene Ho.
• Why were all legacy media outlets showing THIS rally Live?
—— they rarely do that…
—— CNN, MSNBC, FOX, and others decided to show THIS rally?
—— Find out who gave those outlets the green light to show this rally live. Climb the ladder.
These questions can lead the Trump campaign to answers.
https://x.com/Michael_Yon/status/1813286486198132813
Bullet Trace, and interesting matters
It’s nearly 0400 here in Japan. So this is a mind-dump, sans edit:
Interesting on bullet trace — scratching my memories, I do not recall seeing any bullet trace photos from close to 90 degrees from bullet’s flight path. Am not saying it cannot be done. It probably can be done with modern cameras and high shutter speeds.
Now keep in mind I am pretty handy with weapons and with cameras. I was a Special Forces weapons specialist. As a photographer, I shot some of the most famous photos in Iraq and in Afghanistan. Substantial crossover knowledge.
My first thought was — I’d never seen a trace shot from that angle. Second thought was it should be possible. Third thought was that would be a fast shutter speed.
I was preparing to reach out to the photographer. Hunting and pecking online, I found New York Times quoting the shutter speed at 1/8000th of second.
It happens that I have sitting on table here the top three DSLRs Sony makes. The cameras most people salivate over, I have three here. Because I know how important serious gear is.
I use only the very best cameras and lenses. Top gear helped make some of the most interesting and often intense photos in two wars. Unfortunately I often broke lenses while jumping on the ground or hitting against a wall or doorway. No camera ever broke.
I use the cameras regularly though rarely publish photos from them these days. The maximum shutter speed on all three of these cameras in 1/8000.
The the New York Times photographer, Doug Mills, is quoted as shooting at 30fps 1/8000.
Those are settings I would choose if I were trying to catch extremely fast action. Such as a head exploding.
Am not suggesting anything at all. Just as a war correspondent…I never cranked shutter that high even for anything. I wanted to keep ISO lower. Other professionals choose other settings.
https://nytimes.com/.../photo-path-trump-assassination.html
Visa ditt stöd till det informationsarbete Carl genomför
Patreon
Swish
Scanna QR eller skicka till 076-118 25 68. Mottagare är Caroline Norberg.